|
|
|
Aligning Systems:
The Lessons, The Challenges |
|
|
|
Kellogg Foundation: SPARK conference |
|
Atlanta Ga. |
|
Sid Gardner |
|
Children and Family Futures |
|
www.cffutures.com |
|
|
|
|
“aligning systems (schools, providers, state
agencies, and community) so they can more effectively achieve targeted
outcomes for children.” |
|
“strategic arrangement of practices, resources,
and policies across systems to achieve agreed upon outcomes” |
|
Beyond collaboration--to results from new
connections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The handoff from early care and education to
schools |
|
The handoff from parents to both early care and
schools |
|
The handoff from early care and schools to
health providers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
clarity about what “the system” really is |
|
clarity about the purposes of alignment |
|
clarity about what measures of progress and
success will be used by participants to assess the effects of alignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of total funding—10-20 different ECE
funding streams |
|
Data matching—how many kids do we share? |
|
Collaborative values inventory |
|
Annual report card/indicators of child
well-being |
|
Tagging and tracking: |
|
Schools tracking by ECE levels |
|
EC providers tracking their “graduates” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Bridge patrol”: which connections do kids and
parents need most? |
|
Think Noah: 2 by 2 |
|
Bridge-strengthening: how can we better link
kids and parents with services they need most? |
|
Eg early care-school bridges |
|
Eg early care- health bridges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that shared values are as important as
shared data—don’t avoid the values discussion |
|
Outcomes are how the results of alignment are
measured—what will we count to see if our new connections are paying off? |
|
Eg K-1 retentions |
|
Eg health insurance coverage |
|
Eg portfolios accepted by schools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reality-test alignment changes against providers
and parents’ lives: |
|
Will staff have time or want to do it
differently? [new screening/assessment] |
|
Will parents’ real needs be met? |
|
Eg family support vs family income support |
|
Eg child care-welfare contradictions |
|
|
|
|
Continuing TANF support |
|
Child care subsidies |
|
Earned Income Tax Credit (state and federal) |
|
Food stamps/WIC/Free and reduced lunch |
|
Medicaid and Child Health Insurance |
|
Child support |
|
Housing assistance |
|
WIA training for wage upgrades |
|
College and vocational support for wage upgrades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back-end collaboration is among policy level
executives in agencies |
|
Front-end collaboration is among workers who
deal directly with clients |
|
Both are needed for successful collaboration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don’t forget state and local government—Willie
Sutton problems |
|
Keep the inventory current |
|
Outcomes= sustainability; ask “who would want to
pay for this, based on our results?” |
|
Seek $ jointly from multiple sources, not
separately from the same old funders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less organized as a network than other providers
and agencies |
|
Less able to stay current as a field |
|
Less able to collect powerful data and analyze
it |
|
So organize, search, and recognize that
information is the critical commodity in the 21st century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working across the center-home divide to build
solid coalitions |
|
If 2/3 of kids in unlicensed care, why ignore it
proportionate to licensed care? |
|
Defining quality |
|
Addressing lower-quality programs’ recent
expansion |
|
Work with strength where it is found—in homes,
in centers, among parents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A table around which to talk regularly |
|
Facilities and space |
|
Teacher training and practices |
|
Curriculum and assessment changes |
|
Parent access |
|
Information systems changes—tagging |
|
Links to health providers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Hands and feet rules” clear expectations for
behavior |
|
Joint purchasing |
|
Cash—ask for it last—it may be least important |
|
Remember—whatever EC providers ask for, schools
will also ask for changes in what you do |
|
|
|
|
Failure to target programs and
resources—ignoring the universe of need and choices among different kinds
of clients |
|
Failure to concentrate enough resources to
achieve outcomes—dosage issues |
|
Focusing resources on children vs families |
|
Narrow strategies in recruiting and keeping
general partners |
|
Too many outcomes, no priority outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confusing performance measures with client and
community outcomes |
|
Inadequate investment in data collection and
analysis |
|
Poor fit between people and tasks: “brokers vs
strokers” |
|
Inadequate information about all funding
streams—no inventory |
|
Little
or no early sustainability planning |
|
Bonus: Using new funding to buy what old funding
could—missed opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner with us because… |
|
We share clients |
|
You have special expertise we don’t have (or
vice-versa) |
|
Together we could get more funding |
|
Together we could save money downstream |
|
A community VIP wants you to work with us |
|
Working with us would help you innovate and
change your agency culture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We’re going to succeed and you won’t get credit |
|
You might be embarrassed if our program failed
and you got blamed |
|
You will be embarrassed if our program fails
because you will be blamed |
|
If we fail at achieving results, someone else
may take over this function from both of us |
|
If you work with us—we will owe you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listen to the menu of help you can get—then
choose what you really need |
|
(don’t reject what you haven’t ever used; don’t
accept what you don’t need or doesn’t fit) |
|
Keep the network fueled with candor, not
show-and-tell hype: share mistakes or miscues as often as successes |
|
“precious failures” |
|
“did you try this?” |
|
Stay current: read, websurf, conferences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kagan: United We Stand |
|
Kagan: Integrating Services for Children and
Families |
|
Bardach: Getting Agencies to Work Together |
|
Chaskin, et.al. Building Community Capacity |
|
Besharov (CWLA) Enhancing Early Childhood
programs |
|
Gardner: Beyond Collaboration to Results |
|