Notes
Outline
"Aligning Systems:"
Aligning Systems:
The Lessons, The Challenges
Kellogg Foundation: SPARK conference
Atlanta Ga.
Sid Gardner
Children and Family Futures
www.cffutures.com
What is “Aligning Systems?”
“aligning systems (schools, providers, state agencies, and community) so they can more effectively achieve targeted outcomes for children.”
“strategic arrangement of practices, resources, and policies across systems to achieve agreed upon outcomes”
Beyond collaboration--to results from new connections
What do Aligned Systems Look Like?
The handoff from early care and education to schools
The handoff from parents to both early care and schools
The handoff from early care and schools to health providers
The Prerequisites
of Aligned Systems
clarity about what “the system” really is
clarity about the purposes of alignment
clarity about what measures of progress and success will be used by participants to assess the effects of alignment
The Tools of Alignment
Inventory of total funding—10-20 different ECE funding streams
Data matching—how many kids do we share?
Collaborative values inventory
Annual report card/indicators of child well-being
Tagging and tracking:
Schools tracking by ECE levels
EC providers tracking their “graduates”
Slide 6
Tasks and Tips
“Bridge patrol”: which connections do kids and parents need most?
Think Noah: 2 by 2
Bridge-strengthening: how can we better link kids and parents with services they need most?
Eg early care-school bridges
Eg early care- health bridges
More Tips and Tasks
Remember that shared values are as important as shared data—don’t avoid the values discussion
Outcomes are how the results of alignment are measured—what will we count to see if our new connections are paying off?
Eg K-1 retentions
Eg health insurance coverage
Eg portfolios accepted by schools
Still More Tips and Tasks
Reality-test alignment changes against providers and parents’ lives:
Will staff have time or want to do it differently? [new screening/assessment]
Will parents’ real needs be met?
Eg family support vs family income support
Eg child care-welfare contradictions
The Key Family Income Support Programs
Continuing TANF support
Child care subsidies
Earned Income Tax Credit (state and federal)
Food stamps/WIC/Free and reduced lunch
Medicaid and Child Health Insurance
Child support
Housing assistance
WIA training for wage upgrades
College and vocational support for wage upgrades
Slide 11
The Two Kinds of Collaboration
Back-end collaboration is among policy level executives in agencies
Front-end collaboration is among workers who deal directly with clients
Both are needed for successful collaboration
Sustaining Alignment:
the $ Thing
Don’t forget state and local government—Willie Sutton problems
Keep the inventory current
Outcomes= sustainability; ask “who would want to pay for this, based on our results?”
Seek $ jointly from multiple sources, not separately from the same old funders
The Special Challenges for EC Providers
Less organized as a network than other providers and agencies
Less able to stay current as a field
Less able to collect powerful data and analyze it
So organize, search, and recognize that information is the critical commodity in the 21st century
The Special Challenges for EC Providers [more]
Working across the center-home divide to build solid coalitions
If 2/3 of kids in unlicensed care, why ignore it proportionate to licensed care?
Defining quality
Addressing lower-quality programs’ recent expansion
Work with strength where it is found—in homes, in centers, among parents
What to ask schools for
A table around which to talk regularly
Facilities and space
Teacher training and practices
Curriculum and assessment changes
Parent access
Information systems changes—tagging
Links to health providers
What else to ask schools for
“Hands and feet rules” clear expectations for behavior
Joint purchasing
Cash—ask for it last—it may be least important
Remember—whatever EC providers ask for, schools will also ask for changes in what you do
10 Common errors in alignment and collaboration efforts
Failure to target programs and resources—ignoring the universe of need and choices among different kinds of clients
Failure to concentrate enough resources to achieve outcomes—dosage issues
Focusing resources on children vs families
Narrow strategies in recruiting and keeping general partners
Too many outcomes, no priority outcomes
10 errors (continued)
Confusing performance measures with client and community outcomes
Inadequate investment in data collection and analysis
Poor fit between people and tasks: “brokers vs strokers”
Inadequate information about all funding streams—no inventory
 Little or no early sustainability planning
Bonus: Using new funding to buy what old funding could—missed opportunities
Dealing with Reluctant Partners
Partner with us because…
We share clients
You have special expertise we don’t have (or vice-versa)
Together we could get more funding
Together we could save money downstream
A community VIP wants you to work with us
Working with us would help you innovate and change your agency culture
Dealing with Reluctant Partners [more]
We’re going to succeed and you won’t get credit
You might be embarrassed if our program failed and you got blamed
You will be embarrassed if our program fails because you will be blamed
If we fail at achieving results, someone else may take over this function from both of us
If you work with us—we will owe you
Lessons about Multi-state Initiatives
Listen to the menu of help you can get—then choose what you really need
(don’t reject what you haven’t ever used; don’t accept what you don’t need or doesn’t fit)
Keep the network fueled with candor, not show-and-tell hype: share mistakes or miscues as often as successes
“precious failures”
“did you try this?”
Stay current: read, websurf, conferences
Resources
Kagan: United We Stand
Kagan: Integrating Services for Children and Families
Bardach: Getting Agencies to Work Together
Chaskin, et.al. Building Community Capacity
Besharov (CWLA) Enhancing Early Childhood programs
Gardner: Beyond Collaboration to Results